HOW TO SHOP

1 Login or create new account.
2 Review your order.
3 Payment & FREE shipment

If you still have problems, please let us know, by sending an email to support@website.com . Thank you!

SHOWROOM HOURS

Mon-Fri 9:00AM - 6:00AM
Sat - 9:00AM-5:00PM
Sundays by appointment only!

MTECC NEWS

MTECC publishes a fortnightly newsletter, with a short article by one of our members, together with recent news. Please add your details below so we can add you to our distribution list. The latest MTECC news and previous versions are set out below.

Current and previous newsletters

COST INCURRED IN ANTICIPATION OF PERFORMANCE ARE NOT WASTED

Damages for consequential loss for a breach of contract are awarded to place a plaintiff in the same position as if the contract had been performed.  The legal onus to prove loss arising from a breach of contract rests on the plaintiff, the party seeking to recover damages.  But what about situations where a breach

Read More

MTECC Webinar: 3 speaker session on Arbitration and Expert Evidence on 16 September 2024

The Hon Paul Heath KC on ‘Expert Evidence from the Perspective of an Arbitrator and Judge’  The Hon Michael Whitten KC on ‘Commercial Arbitration in the Pacific – Issues and Opportunities‘ Andrew Downie of counsel on ‘Conducting Expert Conclaves and Preparing Joint Reports‘   On Monday 16 September 2024 at 4:30pm to 5:30pm (AEST), MTECC will be hosting a webinar online. The

Read More

Cessnock City Council v 123 259 932 Pty Ltd [2024] HCA 17

In Cessnock City Council v 123 259 932 Pty Ltd [2024] HCA 17 the High Court unanimously upheld the decision of the New South Wales Court of Appeal, finding that damages for breach of contract includes wasted expenditure reasonably incurred in anticipation of, or reliance on, the performance of the contract. As part of its airport development plan,

Read More

Thurin v Krongold [2022] VSCA 226

As has been reported on numerous occasions, in Thurin v Krongold [2022] VSCA 226, the Victorian Court of Appeal determined that VCAT is not a “Court of a State” for the purposes of s 77(iii) of the Constitution and therefore the Victorian State Parliament is incapable of conferring judicial power on VCAT in respect of federal matters.

Read More

AMO Rifat Holdings Pty Ltd v Dib (Building and Property) [2024] VCAT 419

AMO Rifat Holdings Pty Ltd v Dib (Building and Property) [2024] VCAT 419   AMO Rifat Holdings Pty Ltd v Dib (Building and Property) [2024] VCAT 419 is a decision of the President of VCAT, Justice Woodward.  It covers issues commonly encountered in domestic building disputes.   The parties to the major domestic building contract had validly departed from the

Read More

Plunkett v Portier Pacific [2024] VCAT 205

More jurisdiction gymnastics in the domestic building space (yes, more)   There are two recent decisions of note which shift the dial (yet again) as to VCAT’s power to refer matters within its jurisdiction to a court.   The first is Plunkett v Portier Pacific [2024] VCAT 205, a decision of Woodward J (sitting as President of

Read More
1 8 9 10 11 12 15

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

TOP

Subscribe to Download

Please provide your details to download.